|
Post by Jemma Simmons on Apr 28, 2017 10:22:16 GMT
Here you go, ayanami. I'm sure we all know my personal reaction is a "hell to the NO", but... Discuss! 😄 Article
|
|
|
Post by terminator22 on Apr 28, 2017 12:32:05 GMT
I agree 100%. Simmons needs to realize this at some point.
|
|
|
Post by aquaangel on Apr 28, 2017 16:32:00 GMT
Well, so far Fitz hasn't hurt her personally (not physically at least), so ... If that stays true, it will probably be easier for her to forgive him. Whereas Ward nearly killed her and Fitz and also tortured them. It's so personal for her. She loves Fitz, so that will likely help in forgiving him. We all tend to make excuses for those we love when they do something bad. The same can't be said for those we don't love/care deeply for or for those we cannot stand. For Jemma, Ward falls in the latter category. Her forgiving Fitz anything would make sense because we know she loves him. Forgiving Ward, even this nicer version is very difficult for her. It wouldn't make sense if she was all, "oh, you're a different Ward than the Ward I knew, so you're forgiven". To forgive this Ward, she'd have to forgive RW Ward and she cannot do that at this point. Her rational mind knows FW Ward isn't the same as real Ward, but he looks like him. She can't look at him without seeing RW and all he did.
Even Coulson on some level has a shaky feeling around Ward. He doesn't remember Ward killing Rosalind, but subconsciously he knows there's something that keeps him from warming up to him. If he remembered Rosalind, he'd face the same obstacle as Jemma.
I understand the other side of that. This Ward isn't to blame for what his RW counterpart did. However, the wounds to many on the team that were caused by RW Ward are likely to feel fresh for a long time. They are difficult wounds to get over.
The analogy of Ward/Garrett and Fitz/Daddy Fitz is very good though. It's showing how one person can influence one's life for better or for worse.
|
|
|
Post by koos on Apr 28, 2017 16:46:31 GMT
I agree 100%. Simmons needs to realize this at some point Except that the EvilFitz didn't have choice to say no to his father while real life Ward could have said no many times to Garret, for example when Garett had shot Skye.
|
|
|
Post by aquaangel on Apr 28, 2017 17:07:12 GMT
I agree 100%. Simmons needs to realize this at some point Except that the EvilFitz didn't have choice to say no to his father while real life Ward could have said no many times to Garret, for example when Garett had shot Skye. At that point, he had already been brainwashed enough that it was difficult to override that "programming". Look at the way FW Hydra attempted to brainwash those kids. How can we possibly know for sure that RW Ward wasn't exposed to something similar? If he had been it would have been for a longer period of time than those framework kids. Also, there wouldn't have been a rescue for him the way those kids were rescued. Not that I'm excusing his actions, but merely giving an alternative way of looking at his motivations.
|
|
|
Post by backroadjunkie on Apr 28, 2017 17:50:25 GMT
Well, so far Fitz hasn't hurt her personally (not physically at least), Except for that blowing up a building around her and the rest of the team, killing Mace. And murdering an innocent in cold blood. And having the hell beat out of Daisy. This is the one thing that would keep the writers from bringing him back. But after the last ep, I'm sooooo effing conflicted on Ward. And let's be honest. This is the second time a dead Ward has been brought back into the series. The writers really do seem to want him back on the show.
|
|
|
Post by aquaangel on Apr 28, 2017 18:12:28 GMT
I think they wanted us to feel conflicted on Ward and also Fitz. Though I, much like Jemma just blame AIDA for Fitz. She inserted his father into the Framework to manipulate and better control him.
|
|
|
Post by ayanami on Apr 28, 2017 18:22:19 GMT
Here you go, ayanami . I'm sure we all know my personal reaction is a "hell to the NO", but... Discuss! 😄 Article Always me! The article definitely makes a few good points - especially the Ward-Fitz comparison - but I honestly don't see the need to apply any special reasoning to forgive FW Ward. Because there is simply nothing to forgive! He didn't do any of the horrible things real Ward did on the show. I agree with the part about Simmons having more of a problem with this, because she suffered personally at Ward's hands, and it's kind of hard to look past FW Ward looking just like he did and and being so very similar in general. Still, as much as I ended up despising the real Ward, I always assumed that Garrett was the biggest factor in him becoming such a monster. Take him out of the equation, and Ward could have ended up a good guy after all. Now I finally have the confirmation on screen that that is exactly what would have happened. I don't need to look at Fitz to understand what's going on with Ward, though it will be interesting to see if Simmons will ever openly consider the similarities in them becoming "bad guys". Seriously, hating FW Ward for anything real Ward did just seems utterly silly to me. The FW is essentially a mirror world in a classic sci-fi setting. People never blamed Kirk or Spock or any of the other countless characters in the history of movies and television who had an evil doppelganger for the deeds of their counterparts. Why should that be different the other way around?
|
|
|
Post by koos on Apr 28, 2017 19:26:23 GMT
Except that the EvilFitz didn't have choice to say no to his father while real life Ward could have said no many times to Garret, for example when Garett had shot Skye. At that point, he had already been brainwashed enough that it was difficult to override that "programming". Look at the way FW Hydra attempted to brainwash those kids. How can we possibly know for sure that RW Ward wasn't exposed to something similar? If he had been it would have been for a longer period of time than those framework kids. Also, there wouldn't have been a rescue for him the way those kids were rescued. Not that I'm excusing his actions, but merely giving an alternative way of looking at his motivations. My whole issue that they compare Ward to Fitz, when there is no comparison possible. EvilFitz isn't just Fitz who became evil because he had a different path in life. Fitz has been altered by AIDA to fit the profile. He was not given the choice to walk away from his father. To make that possible he is actually already different as a person from the real Fitz. If they want to make a case that Ward could have been a good guy had he met someone else than Garret. That's fine. But Fitz's path is not valid argument in this.
|
|
|
Post by ayanami on Apr 28, 2017 20:40:53 GMT
At that point, he had already been brainwashed enough that it was difficult to override that "programming". Look at the way FW Hydra attempted to brainwash those kids. How can we possibly know for sure that RW Ward wasn't exposed to something similar? If he had been it would have been for a longer period of time than those framework kids. Also, there wouldn't have been a rescue for him the way those kids were rescued. Not that I'm excusing his actions, but merely giving an alternative way of looking at his motivations. My whole issue that they compare Ward to Fitz, when there is no comparison possible. EvilFitz isn't just Fitz who became evil because he had a different path in life. Fitz has been altered by AIDA to fit the profile. He was not given the choice to walk away from his father. To make that possible he is actually already different as a person from the real Fitz. If they want to make a case that Ward could have been a good guy had he met someone else than Garret. That's fine. But Fitz's path is not valid argument in this. Says who? According to everything we've been told about the FW from both Aida and Radcliffe, Fitz changing solely due to his father's influence is exactly what happened. Aida changed one thing - Fitz's regret about growing up without a father - and everything after that basically played itself out. Just like with Coulson, Mack, Mace and May. Sure Aida inserted herself into Fitz's life by assuming the position of Madame Hydra, but at no point has there been so much as hinted at her being directly responsible for his changed personality.
|
|
|
Post by koos on Apr 28, 2017 21:15:54 GMT
My whole issue that they compare Ward to Fitz, when there is no comparison possible. EvilFitz isn't just Fitz who became evil because he had a different path in life. Fitz has been altered by AIDA to fit the profile. He was not given the choice to walk away from his father. To make that possible he is actually already different as a person from the real Fitz. If they want to make a case that Ward could have been a good guy had he met someone else than Garret. That's fine. But Fitz's path is not valid argument in this. Says who? According to everything we've been told about the FW from both Aida and Radcliffe, Fitz changing solely due to his father's influence is exactly what happened. Aida changed one thing - Fitz's regret about growing up without a father - and everything after that basically played itself out. Just like with Coulson, Mack, Mace and May. Sure Aida inserted herself into Fitz's life by assuming the position of Madame Hydra, but at no point has there been so much as hinted at her being directly responsible for his changed personality. The show showed it to us. AIDA did because the realFitz would never want to live with a father like that. The Framework Fitz did and never ever walked away from his father or disagreed with him ever. It was made impossible for him to do so. I call that a change in personality. A big change, because it is a lack of free will and a change in his own moral standards. She changed one regret for each person, but by doing so she also changed the person. The realMay could kill the girl, this May could't kill a child. That's a different May. The realCoulson did join Shield, this Coulson couldn't bare the responsibility. A clear change of character. Mace has been altered the most. He was a normal human, here he was changed into an Inhuman. His DNA was even changed to remove the regret. Only Mack remained more or less the same.
|
|
|
Post by beren44 on Apr 28, 2017 22:00:11 GMT
Says who? According to everything we've been told about the FW from both Aida and Radcliffe, Fitz changing solely due to his father's influence is exactly what happened. Aida changed one thing - Fitz's regret about growing up without a father - and everything after that basically played itself out. Just like with Coulson, Mack, Mace and May. Sure Aida inserted herself into Fitz's life by assuming the position of Madame Hydra, but at no point has there been so much as hinted at her being directly responsible for his changed personality. The show showed it to us. AIDA did because the realFitz would never want to live with a father like that. The Framework Fitz did and never ever walked away from his father or disagreed with him ever. It was made impossible for him to do so. I call that a change in personality. A big change, because it is a lack of free will and a change in his own moral standards. She changed one regret for each person, but by doing so she also changed the person. The realMay could kill the girl, this May could't kill a child. That's a different May. The realCoulson did join Shield, this Coulson couldn't bare the responsibility. A clear change of character. Mace has been altered the most. He was a normal human, here he was changed into an Inhuman. His DNA was even changed to remove the regret. Only Mack remained more or less the same. OK, two replies in one shot here. First, to ayanami, a riddle for you: Question: What do horses and Jemma Simmons have in common? Answer: You can't keep them in the grave! Didn't I just finish digging a big hole? Its true, Aida has said repeatedly that things simply played out on their own, after the regrets were changed, and that is backed up by statements from Radcliffe as well. I for one, don't believe it for a minute. Ever since the Darkhold got thrown in the mix, Aida is out for no one but Aida. Even though she is obliged to technically follow her built-in restraints, she has already demonstrated clever ways to circumvent them. And Radcliffe knows she used his own words against him, she completely outplayed him. (again, due to DH influence) Of course, that is just my opinion And to koos , I totally agree that the comparison is completely flawed right from the premise of it. NONE of the real life players should have a change of heart about the FramePlayers. Of course, that is going to be a little more difficult for Simmons and Daisy, given that they are not regret-changed in the FW. But still, Simmons should no more start warming up to FWWard than she should hating FWFitz. It just makes no sense. And its not like Ward is Mr. GoodyTwoShoes, even in the FW. After all, he was already serving time for first-degree arson, and was willing to lead a deceitful double life, betraying M.H. and FWMay, while working for them. If they all can't get over what happened in the FW when they get back to RL, that's gonna make for some interesting interaction from Mack to May. She did kidnap his daughter, and coerced him into making Daisy reveal herself.
|
|
|
Post by ayanami on Apr 28, 2017 22:39:29 GMT
Says who? According to everything we've been told about the FW from both Aida and Radcliffe, Fitz changing solely due to his father's influence is exactly what happened. Aida changed one thing - Fitz's regret about growing up without a father - and everything after that basically played itself out. Just like with Coulson, Mack, Mace and May. Sure Aida inserted herself into Fitz's life by assuming the position of Madame Hydra, but at no point has there been so much as hinted at her being directly responsible for his changed personality. The show showed it to us. AIDA did because the realFitz would never want to live with a father like that. The Framework Fitz did and never ever walked away from his father or disagreed with him ever. It was made impossible for him to do so. I call that a change in personality. A big change, because it is a lack of free will and a change in his own moral standards. She changed one regret for each person, but by doing so she also changed the person. The realMay could kill the girl, this May could't kill a child. That's a different May. The realCoulson did join Shield, this Coulson couldn't bare the responsibility. A clear change of character. Mace has been altered the most. He was a normal human, here he was changed into an Inhuman. His DNA was even changed to remove the regret. Only Mack remained more or less the same. Fitz was a kid when his father left in the real world. So are you telling me you find it out of character that 10-year old Leopold didn't run away from home in the FW because daddy was a jerk? By the time he got old enough to actually challenge his father, the guy had already had years of influence on him, and was turning Fitz into the guy we seen now. We don't know if there had ever been arguments, just that daddy remained a constant in his son's life. To look at the Ward comparison here; it's not like Ward always agreed with everything Garrett did, but Garrett still managed to control him. It's what years of abuse by a manipulative bastard will do to you. As for May, I don't think she necessarily *couldn't* kill the kid. It's just that she didn't. How many times have you stood in front of an A or B decision and regretted the choice afterwards? Would you really have needed to be a different person to have taken the other path? Similar situation for Coulson, although I'll admit that the change seems a bit deeper here. I'm pretty sure even in the real world he had had doubts about the responsibilities that would come with joining Shield, but he didn't let himself be discouraged by that. FW Coulson did. The situation actually reminds me of the Star Trek TNG episode where Captain Picard gets the chance to go back in time and avoid a fight that would change his whole life. In both cases it was the older character's own regret that caused the change, although via Aida's input in the FW in Coulson's case. Both situations also have in common that the character never developed to their full potential after avoiding this one big risk and never aspired to anything remarkable. Making that one "safe" choice started a pattern for them, that kept them from becoming the person they were meant to be, even though the initial decision had been well within the reasonable options at the time. But I want to point out again that it wasn't some random thing Aida changed to keep Coulson in line or whatever. It's what he wanted, the one thing he in a way regretted, although I don't believe for a second that pre-FW Coulson would have accepted the chance to really go back and change things. I think you can regret something and at the same time know it was for the best. Mace; yeah, sure, Aida changed his DNA into him being an inhuman, but she didn't change his whole character. He was always someone who wanted to do good, to make an impact, she just gave him the opportunity to do so. Also, please note that I'm not saying Aida didn't change things in regards to the characters. Of course she did. I just see no indication that she did so with a particular goal in mind aside from fixing a regret, or that she continued to interfere with their lives beyond the initial change in order to keep them going in the direction she wanted them to.
|
|
|
Post by ayanami on Apr 28, 2017 23:01:44 GMT
The show showed it to us. AIDA did because the realFitz would never want to live with a father like that. The Framework Fitz did and never ever walked away from his father or disagreed with him ever. It was made impossible for him to do so. I call that a change in personality. A big change, because it is a lack of free will and a change in his own moral standards. She changed one regret for each person, but by doing so she also changed the person. The realMay could kill the girl, this May could't kill a child. That's a different May. The realCoulson did join Shield, this Coulson couldn't bare the responsibility. A clear change of character. Mace has been altered the most. He was a normal human, here he was changed into an Inhuman. His DNA was even changed to remove the regret. Only Mack remained more or less the same. OK, two replies in one shot here. First, to @anayami, a riddle for you: Question: What do horses and Jemma Simmons have in common? Answer: You can't keep them in the grave! Didn't I just finish digging a big hole? I see, we're desecrating graves now. Its true, Aida has said repeatedly that things simply played out on their own, after the regrets were changed, and that is backed up by statements from Radcliffe as well. I for one, don't believe it for a minute. Ever since the Darkhold got thrown in the mix, Aida is out for no one but Aida. Even though she is obliged to technically follow her built-in restraints, she has already demonstrated clever ways to circumvent them. And Radcliffe knows she used his own words against him, she completely outplayed him. (again, due to DH influence) Of course, that is just my opinion Then, please, name one instance in which the actions of the real characters in the FW can't be explained by the regrets that were altered in their past. I'm waiting! Are you really saying that Fitz growing up with his SOB dad instead of his mom couldn't have changed him??And to koos , I totally agree that the comparison is completely flawed right from the premise of it. NONE of the real life players should have a change of heart about the FramePlayers. Of course, that is going to be a little more difficult for Simmons and Daisy, given that they are not regret-changed in the FW. But still, Simmons should no more start warming up to FWWard than she should hating FWFitz. It just makes no sense. Sorry, but your argument makes no sense. Fitz is a real person, someone she's known for years and whom she's deeply in love with. His memories and thereby his personality has been altered, yes, but it happened against his will. True, I don't see their relationship commencing if he were to stay this way, but at this point there is obviously no reason for her to hate him. Ward isn't the real Ward, though. So why hate him? What has this guy ever done to her? Nothing! He's basically an alternate reality version of Ward, so why blame him for the actions of someone else? Sure, it might be difficult at first to see past the familiar face (she doesn't seem to be the only one with that problem ), but in the end there is no objective reason to be mad at FW Ward.And its not like Ward is Mr. GoodyTwoShoes, even in the FW. After all, he was already serving time for first-degree arson, (The action of a minor who had been abused his entire life and who had been afraid for his younger brother who had to stay in the same environment. Messes up, sure, but not a reason to condemn the entire character.) and was willing to lead a deceitful double life, betraying M.H. and FWMay, while working for them. Just like Jemma has done when she went undercover with Hydra. Or Bobbi. Or Bobbi and Mack when they infiltrated Coulson's team. I'm still waiting for you to acknowledge all of those people's deceitful double lives! (Not to mention the fact that they're all secret agents, but whatever...)If they all can't get over what happened in the FW when they get back to RL, that's gonna make for some interesting interaction from Mack to May. She did kidnap his daughter, and coerced him into making Daisy reveal herself. Wow, that has to be the tamest part of this whole mess IMO. I think the confrontation between Skye and Fitz, after he tortured her, or May, Fitz and everyone after the two pretty much killed Mace are gonna be far more interesting.
|
|
|
Post by beren44 on Apr 29, 2017 0:22:03 GMT
OK, two replies in one shot here. First, to @anayami, a riddle for you: Question: What do horses and Jemma Simmons have in common? Answer: You can't keep them in the grave! Didn't I just finish digging a big hole? I see, we're desecrating graves now. Its true, Aida has said repeatedly that things simply played out on their own, after the regrets were changed, and that is backed up by statements from Radcliffe as well. I for one, don't believe it for a minute. Ever since the Darkhold got thrown in the mix, Aida is out for no one but Aida. Even though she is obliged to technically follow her built-in restraints, she has already demonstrated clever ways to circumvent them. And Radcliffe knows she used his own words against him, she completely outplayed him. (again, due to DH influence) Of course, that is just my opinion Then, please, name one instance in which the actions of the real characters in the FW can't be explained by the regrets that were altered in their past. I'm waiting! Are you really saying that Fitz growing up with his SOB dad instead of his mom couldn't have changed him??B: Oh no, not saying that at all! Just pointing out that I think there is more to Aida's long game than meets the eye, despite anything that's been said on the show.And to koos , I totally agree that the comparison is completely flawed right from the premise of it. NONE of the real life players should have a change of heart about the FramePlayers. Of course, that is going to be a little more difficult for Simmons and Daisy, given that they are not regret-changed in the FW. But still, Simmons should no more start warming up to FWWard than she should hating FWFitz. It just makes no sense. Sorry, but your argument makes no sense. Fitz is a real person, someone she's known for years and whom she's deeply in love with. His memories and thereby his personality has been altered, yes, but it happened against his will. True, I don't see their relationship commencing if he were to stay this way, but at this point there is obviously no reason for her to hate him. Ward isn't the real Ward, though. So why hate him? What has this guy ever done to her? Nothing! He's basically an alternate reality version of Ward, so why blame him for the actions of someone else? Sure, it might be difficult at first to see past the familiar face (she doesn't seem to be the only one with that problem ), but in the end there is no objective reason to be mad at FW Ward.B: and those are different how? Why should she change her opinion of either RL character, because of changes in the FW?
And its not like Ward is Mr. GoodyTwoShoes, even in the FW. After all, he was already serving time for first-degree arson, (The action of a minor who had been abused his entire life and who had been afraid for his younger brother who had to stay in the same environment. Messes up, sure, but not a reason to condemn the entire character.) and was willing to lead a deceitful double life, betraying M.H. and FWMay, while working for them. Just like Jemma has done when she went undercover with Hydra. Or Bobbi. Or Bobbi and Mack when they infiltrated Coulson's team. I'm still waiting for you to acknowledge all of those people's deceitful double lives! (Not to mention the fact that they're all secret agents, but whatever...)B: I've never denied that most all of them have acted deceitfully at one point or another. I'll even throw in one you skipped, about May reporting to Fury behind Coulson's back. Which led to one of the best plot lines in S1, for me. For 2 episodes or so, anyway.If they all can't get over what happened in the FW when they get back to RL, that's gonna make for some interesting interaction from Mack to May. She did kidnap his daughter, and coerced him into making Daisy reveal herself. Wow, that has to be the tamest part of this whole mess IMO. I think the confrontation between Skye and Fitz, after he tortured her, or May, Fitz and everyone after the two pretty much killed Mace are gonna be far more interesting. B: Meh, I was just trying to point out one that no one had mentioned. There's going to be plenty of humble pie for everyone to have seconds. (to paraphrase a line from DeWitt, on Dollhouse { quick edit: You and I would be dangerous in a mosh pit together Everyone one else would leave via ambulance }
|
|