|
Post by DoTheMath on Oct 3, 2017 2:52:20 GMT
Again, I must ask: WTF critics? Me thinks the critics are out of touch with the general viewing public.....
|
|
|
Post by Hari Seldon on Oct 3, 2017 5:29:04 GMT
Again, I must ask: WTF critics? Me thinks the critics are out of touch with the general viewing public..... You're just now figuring that out? Heck, 30 years back I usually wouldn't bother with a movie if it did well with the critics. Gene Siskel was an exception to that rule.
|
|
|
Post by DoTheMath on Oct 3, 2017 11:44:15 GMT
Again, I must ask: WTF critics? Me thinks the critics are out of touch with the general viewing public..... You're just now figuring that out? Heck, 30 years back I usually wouldn't bother with a movie if it did well with the critics. Gene Siskel was an exception to that rule. No. Not "just", but the gap seems to be widening........
|
|
|
Post by ayanami on Oct 3, 2017 12:19:50 GMT
Again, I must ask: WTF critics? Me thinks the critics are out of touch with the general viewing public..... Yeah, I saw that, too, and could just shake my head at it. For one, I don't think 20% would have been a justified score even after the pilot, but I'm pretty certain they just stopped watching after that. Especially the last two episodes were so good, 20% is ridiculous!
|
|